The other side of this debate is
the non-nativist perspective which argues that environment, rather than
biology, plays the most important role in determining second language
acquisition success. Non-nativists suggest that there is no decline in an
adult’s ability to learn another language if he or she remains healthy. The
greatest obstacle to second language acquisition is doubt, from both the
learner and the teacher that must be overcome in order to succeed. Another factor
is that classroom activities often times are not appropriate for adult learners
(Schepegl, 2003). While younger students use a more communicative approach
to language learning, older students are forced into a more traditional one
(Ruiz de Zaroben, 2005). Rather than the oral exercises and memorizations that
make up older students’ language lesson, the material should be placed into
existing cognitive structures. The reason for this is that as adults we already
have the advantage of high cognitive abilities (Schpegl, 2003). Although
we cannot deem one idea as completely correct, it is obvious that adult second
language learners must make a huge effort if they ever hope to be considered
proficient.
In conclusion, language acquisition is a complex process that we may never
fully understand. Learning a first language is a natural occurrence that we do
with minimal effort. However, acquiring a second language can be much more
difficult depending upon the age at which it is attempted. As a child, second
language acquisition is very similar to first in that the learner does not have
to think about it. By the time a child reaches puberty, the critical period for
language acquisition comes to an end. An adolescent must try hard to learn a new
language while fighting the usual complications that are common during this
time. Adults have the most work cut out for them, but if the methods used to
teach adults second languages continue to improve more adults may reach second
language proficiency.
This topic seemed far more interesting and
appropriate than any other that we could have done. Our research was full of
information a group of twenty year olds studying another language and how to
teach that language to post-pubescent kids would want to know. At first, I was
dismayed by a great deal of this information. I always knew it was easier to
learn a second language as a child, but everything I read seemed to allude to
the idea that it is impossible as an adult. As someone who has wanted to be fluent
in Spanish since the seventh grade (after puberty had begun), it was quite
discouraging to discover that I may never be proficient despite my years of
hard work and effort. However, at the same time it was comforting to find out
my thoughts and worries on this topic were not abnormal but rather almost
universal for second language learners! I felt I had a lot in common with the
Polish immigrants in that I plan out what I am going to say before I say it out
loud and I get nervous about making mistakes, especially in front of native
speakers. Instead of simply acquiring language without any effort, we
adolescents and adults must put fort every bit of effort we have. Already
knowing a language can be a disadvantage in that we convert everything in our
heads and when certain phrases do not translate exactly, it is frustrating and
difficult to stay motivated. As they non-nativists point out, it may not be all
about the critical period; external factors can play a role in how we learn a
second language. If our teachers keep the environment interactive and come up
with interesting ways to relate new information to our prior knowledge, we may
stand a chance in becoming fluent in a second language. As future teachers of
language, whether it is Spanish, French, Latin, or even English, we must make
sure to utilize these concepts when teaching adolescents a second language.
No comments:
Post a Comment